It isn’t all bad, there are times when you just want to think ‘Bad Credit Checks’. These are checks that you will never get, you simply ask a bank for their bad credit check. Most banks do these checks to make sure that they are taking your money. In my experience, 90% of the time people never ask for or receive their credit check, it never actually happens. Usually they just don’t understand the difference in the amount of money you get for getting approved for a checking or cash advance. I don’t know of a case in history that anybody had ever gotten their check or their sent to the wrong bank! Do that each time and you’ll never get a check back, only 7-10 years might have passed since your first check. We can do better. I’ll be back with my first ever post on how we can get credit on our own.
Bad Credit Bankruptcy – Comparing Credit Bias
How do consumers deal with false statements in filing bankruptcy? How do courts protect consumers in applying repeated adverse results in their creditors? Each step that takes place in applying the cumulative of a variety of available and such factors, to consider a consumer, to whom a debt is being carried on the debt at one particular instalment, is applied with a degree of bias, potentially to the debtors in most cases. The number of letters, addresses, and names included in files from which the Court scrutinizes several characteristics. And because of the type of debt settlement offered in the Better Business Bureau Act (BBBA), many bankruptcy filers may not qualify for such a program. Therefore, applicants seeking debt settlement must consider several factors. By considering these factors, applicants make a better decision than if creditors treated debtors with special needs individuals of a different sex, or victims of certain cancers (such as Hodgkins lymphoma), as having a different opportunity.
The Bottom Line
With increasing numbers of individuals applying for and receiving credit with histories of debt repayment, a court may decide to allow certain such accounts to be closed in the event of a decision by the Court to order these individuals’ accounts kept open in the absence of documentation that demonstrates a history of paying the creditor’s requested due and timely bills. But the Court does not specify when such a record will be destroyed, what action the Court intends to take, or, how those same records will be destroyed after the court enshrine the decision in law. When that happens, a consumer with poor credit history will be put directly in an even stricter position than an individual without poor credit could be by such a decision.
In this article I will describe the several findings that have been made about this issue by the Private Bank Credit Service (BCS), one of the nation’s leading credit counseling and debt reduction agencies. Their first concern related to the legality of making payments on debts and their second concern with the fact that most bankruptcy filers end up paying a much lower effective total interest payment than having the remaining balances in the bureaus entirely eternally closed.
I. For a person with a bad credit history whose bankruptcy may reflect a change in his or her financial status, the current bankruptcy law imposes financial penalties on those whose previous conduct has shown no change in their financial circumstances. Since no change in having a job or being in a union has been reported on their credit reports, the effective penalty amounts to a $50 per month or a ‘2 weekly minimum payment which is applied to all debts the person’s reporting agency receives every month. The average reduction in monthly payments, under the current law, is about 25 percent of the total outstanding debt. In addition, the BCS has found that only 33 percent of individuals with poor financial performance pay a late or excessive monthly payment. In addition, only 15 percent of those who filed for bankruptcy ultimately pay off their balances each month, with the remaining 29 percent — many of them — reaching bankruptcy by the grace period of their original bankruptcy. In other words, those making their payments on their balances almost never reach their payments by the due date. In this case, the current statute is the soundest solution.
II. The Law’s Bottom Line
The Supreme Court’s decision upholds a lower court’s ruling that ordered a California bank to pay the money owed to a bankrupt woman for five years. Bankruptcy is not a quick fix, it will likely take four to six years to render such a reduction necessary to perform repaying a debt. Any individual who is planning to rebuild from several bankruptcy judgments can apply for a new credit bankruptcy, and most don’t.